Warning: members of the public are being contacted by people claiming to work for AXA Investment Managers UK Limited.  Find out more information and what to do by clicking here.

Exterior of a modern office building with man looking out window

The issue with passive fixed income

  • 29 June 2021 (5 min read)

Many investors are reliant on fixed income securities to meet their long-term need for stable, income-generating assets. Often, that reliance extends to securities of traditional fixed income indices, bringing a series of risks into play for institutional and smaller investors alike.

Indices are not perfectly constructed, relying on periodic rebalancing rules which leave them open to concentration risk – across issuers, sectors and countries. For long-term investors, who require diversified sources of cash-flow, this can be a major problem. We consider the problems that passive investors can face due to falling credit quality and issuer-specific risks below, focusing particularly on the sterling corporate credit market.

Falling credit quality

Recent years have seen a decrease in the average credit quality of indices; the ultra-low interest rate environment since 2015 likely provided corporate treasurers with a strong incentive to increase the overall level of indebtedness in their capital structures. This has resulted in a drop in the average credit quality of issuers, driving a large increase in the BBB component of credit indices. The COVID-19 crisis has served to accelerate that trend. In the most liquid markets, BBBs now typically account for more than 50% of the investable universe in investment grade (IG) credit indices, as shown in figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Triple-B credits on the rise

  January 2015 % of BBB debt December 2020 of BBB debt % change
ICE BofA Sterling Corporate 40.2% 50.2% 10.2%
ICE BofA Europe Corporate Index 41.7% 51.0% 9.3%
ICE BofA US Corporate Index 44.1% 50.7% 6.6%

Source: AXA IM, Inter Continental Exchange, April 2021

Since the start of the pandemic, ratings agencies have downgraded over $1.1trn of corporate issues across global credit indices. This rating action has been issuer and sector specific, exacerbating the existing problem of issuer and sector concentrations, as BBB issuers have moved downward and out of the investment grade universe, and A-rated bonds have migrated towards BBB.

For those reliant on the higher quality, 10+ year and 15+ year A-AAA indices, such as the UK pension industry this presents a serious challenge and comes at a time when there is increasing demand for high quality, long-dated asset. Plans are increasingly putting cashflow-generating solutions in place, and there are an increased number of investors chasing less available, high-quality assets. The ability to source these rare assets remains key to achieving portfolio goals.

Issuer-specific risk

Over the last two years, we have seen a number of high-profile issuers downgraded and exit the high-quality sterling indices. The largest downgraded issuers are listed below.

Figure 2: major names are seeing downgrades....

Issuer Class 10+ 15+ Index exit Issue cited
General electric Senior + subordinated 2.40% 2.38% Oct/Nov 2018 Idiosyncratic
Heathrow funding Senior - Class A 2.30% 2.04% April 2020 COVID-19
HSBC Subordinated - LT2 2.49% 2.79% May 2020 COVID-19 and idiosyncratic
National grid* Senior 1.01% 0.97% March 2021 Idiosyncratic

…. whilst others are clearly at risk

  Class 10+ 15+ Current ratings
EDF** Senior 6.51% 6.31%




Source: AXA IM, Inter Continental Exchange, as of March 2021. *At the time of writing, UK utility National Grid suffered a downgrade to BBB+ and is scheduled to leave A-AAA indices at the end of March 2021.** EDF is considered at risk of exit should one of its remaining A ratings suffer a downgrade.

In sterling corporate credit, where the top ten issuers (out of 120) already account for close to a third of the index market value, fixed income investors are now facing the possibility that Électricité de France (EDF), the second-largest issuer, may lose one of its two remaining A- ratings. The French energy company is already rated BBB+ by S&P and is on negative outlook at both Moody’s and Fitch. This would have the effect of leaving investors reliant on an increasingly concentrated asset class (see Figure 3 below).

Investors who passively follow a benchmark approach will have to navigate potentially challenging index transitions. We saw an example of this in April and May 2020, when index-tracking investors found themselves unable to efficiently transact credit that had suffered rating downgrades and lobbied fixed income index providers seeking to waive the usual month-end index-rebalancing rules.

Figure 3 illustrates this issuer concentration problem in the 15+ A-AAA index, with the resulting simulated weights of the largest 20 issuers, should EDF be downgraded and exit the index.

Figure 3: measuring the impact of an EDF exit

Issuer Current weight Simulated weight if EDF downgraded
European Investment Bank 6.86 7.32
EDF 6.31 --
GSK 3.66 3.91
Pfizer 2.58 2.75
LCR finance 2.54 2.71
The Wellcome Trust 2.32 2.47
Clarion Funding 2.22 2.37
Affordable Housing Finance 2.16 2.31
SNCF Reseau 2.12 2.26
Housing Finance Corp 2.08 2.22
London & Quadrant Housing 1.97 2.10
Aspire Defence Finance 1.91 2.04
Transport for London 1.87 2.00
Berkshire Hathaway Finance 1.85 1.98
Engie 1.79 1.91
Notting Hill Genesis 1.59 1.70
Sanctuary Capital 1.54 1.64
Citigroup 1.52 1.62
Motability 1.51 1.61
kfW 1.47 1.57

Source: AXA IM simulation based on ICE BofA index data as of 23 March 2021. For illustrative purposes only. This forecast should not be relied upon and does not constitute a representation or guarantee as to future outcomes.

How can investors manage concentration risk?

When building our fixed income portfolios, we aim to diversify cash flows across issuers, sectors and geographic sources of earnings, while drawing on research into key environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.

Issuers: No one issuer should be a single large driver of fund returns. To achieve this, we cap the size of issuers based on their credit quality, rather than in reference to their index weights. This helps to avoid us lending the most units of risk to the most indebted issuers, which are most heavily represented in the indices. We also need to be mindful that mergers or acquisitions can further increase an issuer’s debt concentration.

Sectors: No one sector should be overly dominant in a fund. For example, the real estate sector makes up over 29% of the ICE BofA AAA-A Sterling Non-Gilt 15+ index – far too high a concentration, we believe, given the dynamics of the UK economy and the credit rating linkage to the sovereign.

Geographic source of earnings: An overly large reliance on cash flows generated by solely UK-focused entities leaves portfolios more exposed to idiosyncratic country risk – be that political or economic. The international representation of bond indices can allow an investor to source assets backed by international cash flows, without having to take non-sterling currency risk.

ESG considerations: We believe issuers with higher ESG quality are potentially less likely to migrate downwards in credit quality, and likely to move more slowly if they do. Poor governance especially can lead to rapid downgrades of multiple rating notches which can result in much trickier and more costly index transitions. A comprehensive internal assessment of management and controls should allow for discrimination between issuers. Separately, a focus on sector-specific ESG issues – for example, reduced future values for oil reserves – highlights the importance of sectoral diversification and sector limits.

Seeking to protect clients

The reduction in average credit quality over the last five years was accelerated by the COVID-19 crisis during 2020. This has left high-quality assets in shorter supply at a time when demand for them is rising. This creates increased concentration risk for those investors who had planned to rely on passive alignment with credit indices. In this new environment, nuanced and intricate challenges emerge through large fixed income index rebalancings when issuers are downgraded.

Careful management of credit allocations seeks to mitigate the risks discussed here. At AXA IM we believe that a deep and targeted focus on diversification, allied with an ESG-integrated assessment of fundamental credit quality, can potentially allow more balanced and responsive portfolio construction. Our goal is to ensure investors are insulated from some of those avoidable negative biases of fixed income indices.

Fixed income

Fixed income investing at AXA IM

We cover a broad spectrum of fixed income strategies to help investors build diverse portfolios that can be more resilient to economic and market shifts

Find out more

Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox

Subscribe to updates.

Related Articles

Fixed Income

Inflation Market Quarterly Update

  • by Elida Rhenals
  • 18 July 2024 (3 min read)
Fixed Income

Why US high yield continues to surprise investors

  • by Jack Stephenson
  • 16 July 2024 (5 min read)
Fixed Income

Inflation-linked bonds: more than just inflation

  • by Ana Otalvaro, Elida Rhenals
  • 10 July 2024 (3 min read)

    Not for Retail distribution

    This document is intended exclusively for Professional, Institutional, Qualified or Wholesale Clients / Investors only, as defined by applicable local laws and regulation. Circulation must be restricted accordingly.

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    Due to its simplification, this document is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee forecasts made will come to pass. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this document is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this document. Whilst every care is taken, no representation or warranty (including liability towards third parties), express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information contained herein. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the recipient. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision.

    Risk Warning

    The value of investments, and the income from them, can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. 

    Are you an IFA or other Professional Investor ?

    Are you a financial advisor, institutional, or other professional investor?

    This section is for professional investors only. You need to confirm that you have the required investment knowledge and experience to view this content. This includes understanding the risks associated with investment products, and any other required qualifications according to the rules of your jurisdiction.