Warning: members of the public are being contacted by people claiming to work for AXA Investment Managers UK Limited.  Find out more information and what to do by clicking here.

Macro and Market commentaries

The US government has caught up, but the ECB still has some way to go


Gilles Moec, Group Chief Economist at AXA Investment Managers, comments on the global COVID-19 crisis and latest fiscal policy announcements from the US Fed and ECB:

The Fed is still “plugging the holes” they had in their stimulus programme. They have received from the Treasury the authorisation to add commercial paper to the list of assets they can purchase, while the re-activation of the Primary Dealers facility will further support this segment of the market, incentivising the major credit institutions operating in the US to hold those securities for refinancing at the NY Fed. This is likely to add to the pressure on the ECB to add (non-financial) commercial paper to its corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP) universe very quickly. There is one last “hole” that remains at the Fed: corporate bonds.

Mnuchin’s announcements on fiscal policy lack details at this stage, but the overall quantum (c5% of GDP) looks impressive. The most spectacular part is the direct cash handouts directed at households. This is not entirely new in the US – Obama did something similar in 2009, although it was more targeted than what Mnuchin seems to have in mind here – but it will probably trigger some “envy” in Europe.

The conditions are different. The handout is a way to offset the weakness of “automatic stabilisers” in the US, while in Europe social transfers can fairly quickly replace lost labour income. We also need to see if the US government is as generous as the European ones in terms of guarantees offered on corporate debt. These do not sit on the deficits for accounting reasons but they are central to providing the private sector with a “bridge” while it is dealing with the lockdown.

In my opinion, the cash handouts are not “helicopter money”. Helicopter money would be currency “printed” by the central bank and issued to households without any counterparty on the central bank’s balance sheet (basically the CB would be in “negative equity”). Here, because of QE a large part of the programme will be funded by the Fed, but in exchange for government securities. It may seem to be a subtle difference but it actually matters.

I think proper helicopter money is next to impossible in the Euro area. Conversely, direct government cash handouts to households partly funded by the ECB through QE is possible, even if the limit on this would be lower than in the US – as long as the ECB sticks to its limits on public debt holding.

At the end of last week the US and the Euro area were mirror images: the US Fed went further than the ECB, but the US government had been more hesitant than its European counterparts. Now the US government has caught up, but the ECB still has some way to go.

The Fed is still “plugging the holes” they had in their stimulus programme. They have received from the Treasury the authorisation to add commercial paper to the list of assets they can purchase, while the re-activation of the Primary Dealers facility will further support this segment of the market, incentivising the major credit institutions operating in the US to hold those securities for refinancing at the NY Fed. This is likely to add to the pressure on the ECB to add (non-financial) commercial paper to its corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP) universe very quickly. There is one last “hole” that remains at the Fed: corporate bonds.

Mnuchin’s announcements on fiscal policy lack details at this stage, but the overall quantum (c5% of GDP) looks impressive. The most spectacular part is the direct cash handouts directed at households. This is not entirely new in the US – Obama did something similar in 2009, although it was more targeted than what Mnuchin seems to have in mind here – but it will probably trigger some “envy” in Europe.

The conditions are different. The handout is a way to offset the weakness of “automatic stabilisers” in the US, while in Europe social transfers can fairly quickly replace lost labour income. We also need to see if the US government is as generous as the European ones in terms of guarantees offered on corporate debt. These do not sit on the deficits for accounting reasons but they are central to providing the private sector with a “bridge” while it is dealing with the lockdown.

In my opinion, the cash handouts are not “helicopter money”. Helicopter money would be currency “printed” by the central bank and issued to households without any counterparty on the central bank’s balance sheet (basically the CB would be in “negative equity”). Here, because of QE a large part of the programme will be funded by the Fed, but in exchange for government securities. It may seem to be a subtle difference but it actually matters.

I think proper helicopter money is next to impossible in the Euro area. Conversely, direct government cash handouts to households partly funded by the ECB through QE is possible, even if the limit on this would be lower than in the US – as long as the ECB sticks to its limits on public debt holding.

At the end of last week the US and the Euro area were mirror images: the US Fed went further than the ECB, but the US government had been more hesitant than its European counterparts. Now the US government has caught up, but the ECB still has some way to go.

    Disclaimer

    Notes to Editors

    About AXA Investment Managers 
    AXA Investment Managers (AXA IM) is an active, long-term, global multi-asset investor. We work with clients today to provide the solutions they need to help build a better tomorrow for their investments, while creating a positive change for the world in which we all live. With approximately €801 billion in assets under management as at end of December 2019, AXA IM employs over 2,360 employees around the world and operates out of 28 offices across 20 countries. AXA IM is part of the AXA Group, a world leader in financial protection and wealth management.

    • Visit our website: www.axa-im.com  
    • Follow us on Twitter: @AXAIM & @AXAIM_UK
    • Follow us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/axa-investment-managers   
    • Visit our media centre: www.axa-im.com/en/media-centre

    Disclaimer

    AXA Investment Managers UK Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. This press release is as dated. This does not constitute a Financial Promotion as defined by the Financial Conduct Authority and is for information purposes only. No financial decisions should be made on the basis of the information provided.

    Issued by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068 Registered Office is 7 Newgate Street, London, EC1A 7NX. 
    A member of the Investment Management Association. Telephone calls may be recorded or monitored for quality.

    Information relating to investments may have been based on research and analysis undertaken or procured by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited for its own purposes and may have been made available to other members of the AXA Investment Managers Group who in turn may have acted upon it. This material should not be regarded as an offer, solicitation, invitation or recommendation to subscribe for any AXA investment service or product and is provided to you for information purposes only. The views expressed do not constitute investment advice and do not necessarily represent the views of any company within the AXA Investment Managers Group and may be subject to change without notice. No representation or warranty (including liability towards third parties), express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information contained herein.

    Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Changes in exchange rates will affect the value of investments made overseas. Investments in newer markets and smaller companies offer the possibility of higher returns but may also involve a higher degree of risk.

    Risk Warning

    The value of investments, and the income from them, can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.